Technical Leadership and Advisory

Team supervision, code audits, hiring and CTO-as-a-service. Senior expertise without the full-time hire.

W10

W11

W12

TODAY

Kickoff & Discovery

Planning

100%

Architecture Design

Planning

100%

Auth & Core API

Development

100%

Frontend Scaffold

Development

100%

Billing Integration

Development

65%

Dashboard UI

Development

20%

QA & Testing

Testing

Performance Audit

Testing

Staging & Go Live

Launch

Project

Progress44%

Total9

Done4

In progress2

Blocked0

Upcoming3

Click a task to inspect its details

Legend

Done

In Progress

Upcoming

Blocked

Today

Who is this for?

01
You have a development team but lack senior technical leadership.
02
Your codebase has degraded and you need an honest audit before moving forward.
03
You're hiring technical profiles and want an expert eye on candidates.

What I deliver

Code audit with prioritized report: technical debt, security, performance, maintainability.
Definition or overhaul of engineering practices: code review, branching, deploy process, documentation.
Hiring support: job description writing, technical interviews, candidate evaluation.
Regular team sessions: mentoring, architecture review, structural decisions.
Technical roadmap aligned with product objectives and resource constraints.

Tools & Methods

GitHubLinearNotionDockerCI/CDSonarQubeDatadogArchitecture Review

FAQ

What's the difference from a full-time CTO?: Availability and cost. A fractional CTO engages on topics that genuinely need it — architecture, hiring, critical decisions. Between engagements, you're not paying a fixed salary. It's suited to transition or structuring phases.
How does a code audit work?: I access the repository and spend 2 to 3 days analyzing structure, quality, security and test coverage. I deliver a report with issues ranked by criticality and concrete recommendations — not a generic best-practices checklist.
Can technical leadership be combined with development?: Yes — that's often the most effective setup. I supervise architecture and contribute directly to code on critical parts. It eliminates the gap between what's decided and what gets built.

Discuss Your Need

What I deliver

Code audit with prioritized report: technical debt, security, performance, maintainability.

Definition or overhaul of engineering practices: code review, branching, deploy process, documentation.

Hiring support: job description writing, technical interviews, candidate evaluation.

Regular team sessions: mentoring, architecture review, structural decisions.

Technical roadmap aligned with product objectives and resource constraints.

FAQ

What's the difference from a full-time CTO?

Availability and cost. A fractional CTO engages on topics that genuinely need it — architecture, hiring, critical decisions. Between engagements, you're not paying a fixed salary. It's suited to transition or structuring phases.

How does a code audit work?

I access the repository and spend 2 to 3 days analyzing structure, quality, security and test coverage. I deliver a report with issues ranked by criticality and concrete recommendations — not a generic best-practices checklist.

Can technical leadership be combined with development?

Yes — that's often the most effective setup. I supervise architecture and contribute directly to code on critical parts. It eliminates the gap between what's decided and what gets built.